And Now For Something Completely Different…


, , , , , , , ,

Your American Hero & Honorary Admin of the BV Files Thomas Retzlaff!

Good day, eh?  Well not so good if you are current Nazi / former attorney (and pedo guy) Jason Lee Van Dyke of Decatur, Texas.  He was forced to sit for a 7 1/2 hour long federal court deposition last Monday, August 31, that was conducted by your American Hero & Honorary Admin of the BV Files Houston attorney Jeffrey Dorrell. 

Present in Houston was your American Hero & Honorary Admin of the BV Files Thomas Retzlaff, along with attorney Kent Hanszen and two paralegals and some other people.

According to sources close to the investigation (that consist mainly of the voices in our head), Van Dyke managed to talk himself out of his lawsuit by making several damaging admissions that established once and for all that (big surprise) he has no case – he has NO EVIDENCE – to support his claims of libel per se, business disparagement, tortious interference with prospective relations, malicious criminal prosecution, and (most importantly for all of us) Van Dyke finally admitted that there is no such thing as “criminal stalking” or “harassment” by blogging!!!

Van Dyke also admitted that the only source of his “evidence” that the BV Files blog is run by Retzlaff is James McGibney (who we don’t like).  This basically guarantees that McGibney will be forced to sit down for his own deposition in this $100 million federal court lawsuit.


Van Dyke and his Massive Stack Of Proof – all 100% VERIFIED “evidence”.  Too bad he forgot to bring any of it to his deposition.




And then we have this to discuss:

What’s this all about?


And what did this guy have to say at the end?

Some people seem to be of the opinion that anti-SLAPP sanctions are no longer at issue.  But it seems that Judge Cosby has a far different opinion and he will have the last word on November 19th.  CHECK IT OUT!!








But that is really not what this blog post is about.

We here at the BV Files are about to do something completely different.  And that is we are going to have a guest commentator bring you, our teeming MILLIONS of readers, listeners, and supporters, our newest and bestest article.

This is something amazing, show stopping, spectacular, never the same, totally unique, completely not ever been done before in our more than 30 years of publishing this blog.  (Not unless you count the times we had a guest articles written by Joseph (“Jo Jo”) Camp.  Or that time we allowed Neal Rauhauser to go wild and write something absolutely insane that involved skittle balls, Venn diagrams and such.  Oh, and then there was that time when Sue Basko complained about something she saw and demanded that we allow her to write a long-winded rebuttal about…., well you get the point.)


BUT FIRST we wish to remind each and everyone of you, our teeming MILLIONS of readers, listeners, and supporters




I am not Thomas. We are not Thomas. We are sure that there is a Thomas (somewhere), and that he might have said some mean things on the interwebz, but he is not me, and I am not him, and he is not us. Nor are we Neal, Jo Jo, Lane, Jeff, Mark, or Lora (all people whom McGibney has accused of being Admins of the BV Files at one time or another).




For those of you new to BV Files, here is a guide to help you understand the players, who we don’t like, and why:

  1. ViaView, Inc. is a company incorporated in Delaware that is owned by seven guys involved in the construction industry in Las Vegas, Nevada.
  2. is a revenge porn site that is run by ViaView. On Cheaterville people can post intimate photos and personal details about their ex-. If you find yourself posted on Cheaterville, you will be forced to pay them $499 (or more!) if you want to ransom back your photos and get the post removed.
  3. is a hate speech / bullying website that is run by ViaView. While on the surface the website looks innocently enough, if you just barely scratch the surface by looking in its Articles section you will find some of the most vile and ugly hate speech one could ever imagine.
  4. James Alexander McGibney. He is born in Oct. 31, 1973, and is from the town of Monroe, NY, who now lives in Round Rock, Texas, and is married to Christina Orduna McGibney (born in June 12, 1981 in the SF-Bay area), with whom he has three small boys with (despite the fact that he has repeatedly been accused of being a pedophile!)  McGibney is a liar, a thief, and a criminal – seriously. He has falsely claimed to having an Executive Education from Harvard Business School. He does have a FAKE college degree from Chadwick University, a well known diploma mill since shut down by the Govt., and has filed for Ch. 7 bankruptcy at least twice in recent years.


ViaView Logo

The owners of ViaView consist of the following individuals:

  1. Dave Suder – West Coast President/CEO of KHS&S Contracting, who is also on the Board of Regents for Servite Catholic High School in Anaheim, CA. (His son David Stone Suder who was found GUILTY in Orange County, CA, of multiple counts of child rape involving VERY YOUNG CHILDREN in October 2016!)
  2. Mark Caspers – Senior Partner & CEO at Las Vegas based Integrated Capital & Development Solutions (ICDS).
  3. Michael T. Carr – a man who calls himself “The Profit Prophet” (bet he didn’t see this coming?) and who is currently in hiding from his wife’s divorce lawyer.
  4. Wayne P. (Pat) Hibbs – Senior Vice President at Ledcor Construction Inc. in Las Vegas.
  5. Nikolas (Nick) Mamula – owner of a Las Vegas pre-fabricated stone products & tile company called T. Nicholas Co.
  6. Scott Corey Ryan – a lawyer licensed to practice law in Arizona, Illinois, and Nevada who is employed as Senior Vice President & General Counsel for Tutor Perini Building Group in Phoenix, AZ.
  7. James McGibney – serial resume fraudster & deadbeat with TWO Chapter 7 bankruptcies under his belt.


Q: What is an LOLsuit and why do you constantly refer to them here?
A: An LOLsuit is a portmanteau from taking “LOL” (Laugh Out Loud) and combining it with “lawsuit.”  Thus, an LOLsuit is a joke lawsuit, or a lawsuit that is a joke. Note that it is a very real lawsuit filed in a real court.  But the premise behind the lawsuit, or the legal reasoning expressed therein, is a total joke (i.e. makes one LOL when reading it).


So, without further ado we bring you the following guest article from a person claiming to be Mr. Retzlaff:



Survey Finds Airplanes Are Best Place To Masturbate In Public


I recently took a trip to Disney World with my family.  Our first plane trip in months since the start of the Chinese virus.  There were not very many people on the plane.  On a 4 1/2 hour flight from Phoenix to Orlando you run out of things to do.  So you find yourself getting creative.

Those of us, I mean, you, who are chronic public masturbators know that getting caught comes with a stiff sentence.  Amirite?  But thanks to information on airplane seat masturbation, we know it’s a relatively safe space to live out our, I mean, your, truth.

While one in five stewardesses admit to being notified of a public jacker at least once in their careers, the airline companies rarely take the time to escalate the offenses to the police.  But when I do it in front of the pilates window it’s a sex crime?  I mean, you.

A survey found that 1 out of 5 flight attendants had received a report of passenger-on-passenger sexual assault during a flight. The findings showed that law enforcement was contacted or met the plane less than half of the time.

According to Buzzfeed News, after a woman named Mikaela Dixon reported a guy jacking off next to her:

…The flight attendant moved her to another row and told her that the crew had contacted law enforcement officials to meet the man at the gate. But the airline never called law enforcement. The alleged masturbator was escorted out of the terminal by United’s own security personnel — and then released.

United first [said] that it contacted Chicago (where the plane landed) police. Then a spokesperson later said that its flight crew and gate agent had decided not to do so. The airline is now reviewing why that never happened.

In the US, punishment for public masturbation varies from state to state, and can be classified under “lewd acts in public,” “indecent exposure,” or other great names for 80’s sex comedies.  This is all, of course, unless you’re flying the friendly skies.  Then it’s called “just a Tuesday.”


*Obvious Retzlaff is not a guest commentator here.  But wouldn’t it be funny if he was?








oh, yeah!



This will never not be funny…

Randazza tweet




FL State Bar v Marc Randazza - Report of Referee



On September 3, 2020, the Florida State Bar just placed Marc Randazza on an additional one year of probation after finding him GUILTY of stealing client monies.  CHECK IT OUT!!



Why did that happen?

Ars Tech


FUN FACT:  The whole dispute seems to have ended so poorly for Randazza that it’s easy to forget he was the party who began it.  When Randazza filed a claim shortly after he departed from the company in 2012, Liberty had actually offered him money to settle it – $200,000 in money to just GO AWAY.

I just kept shaking my head at this clusterfuck thinking “How could someone get into this mess and then keep making decisions to go deeper and deeper?”

Then I remembered the First Book of Timothy, Chapter Six, Verse Ten:
For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after… and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.


Marc Randazza is a BIG supporter of revenge pornography and has been heavily involved in the sexual blackmail of little girls (and some men!) due to his repeated legal representation of James McGibney (who we don’t like) in several lawsuits that were filed against McGibney for…. revenge porn, extortion, defamation, and blackmail, and for his role in filing a series of lawsuits for McGibney as a part of McGibney’s SLAPP schemes.

If it were not for Randazza and his guiding hand, the revenge pornography empire that is ViaView, Inc. and James McGibney would not exist today.


cheaterville banner






So whatever happened to the “Mean Texas Lawyer” who was going to intimidate his critics into submission?  CHECK IT OUT!!



This just in – hot off the presses from the desk of the U.S. District Court Judge Sean Jordan.  Clearly he does not like Nazis who have the look of a pedophile.


U.S. District Court Judge Sean D. Jordan





Given all of the above, this comment here will never not be funny, am I right, Jason?


Comment made by Jason Lee Van Dyke



It sucks of Van Dyke that the federal court system totally does not give two shits about the tears of a Nazi / pedo guy – 100% VERIFIED!


And this is pretty funny, too.  Thanks to Some Random Person We’ve Never Heard Of Before for posting this in a comment yesterday.  Much more to come, we are sure!












For the past several weeks, many of you, our teeming MILLIONS of readers, listeners, and supporters have been wondering where your American Hero & Honorary Admin of the BV Files Thomas Retzlaff has been.  We don’t know.  Retzlaff is not an Admin here and it is not our turn to watch him today.  But…we did get this in the mail.






Special Update

On McGibney’s website he claims that a certain person named Thomas Retzlaff is supposedly GUILTY of Stolen Valor FRAUD.  McGibney claims he has “evidence” of this and posts what he claims are copies of this man’s DD214 military records.


This is what a military DD 214 looks like.  Unless it actually has the words DD 214 written on it, it is not that person’s full and official military records.  What McGibney is posting instead is completely FAKE BULLSHIT (big surprise).  They are bogus documents that he created on his computer – just like that real FAKE “evidence” he created for the federal LOLsuit and for the rest of his little “articles” on his Bullyville website.



McGibney DD214



You know what I find amazing: How James McGibney can claim he is in fear for his life (and the lives of his family) and is being stalked while at the exact same time all McGibney seems to do is make websites about Retzlaff, post defamatory comments about Retzlaff, and just go on and on and on about how mean and terrible Retzlaff is (at least 95 “articles” by my count on McGibney’s website).

Does McGibney think that the police, that a judge, that a jury, would all be soooo stupid as to think that HE is the victim in light of all of this?

McGibney thinking that is what cost him $1.3 million along with everything he has tried to work for for the past five years.

What a dumb ass – seriously, to think that people would not see through him and see James McGibney for what he really and truly is.



The following is from a Guest Author – the real guest author:

We hope that the FBI is watching us and will enjoy!


white knight

Sit back and let us tell you a little story about an internet hero, James McGibney.  As we all know, Mr. McGibney set up a website so he could properly battle the bullies of the internet.  He’ll be first to tell you that he targets pedophiles and revenge porn.  (We can’t find any record of him bringing a single pedophile to justice.  If you know of one, please post the name and the court dates in the comments.)  As for revenge porn, he only targeted the site(s) that were competition for his own revenge porn site,

Back to the reason for this post.  Let’s talk about Kate Gosselin and her relationship with James McGibney.  First things first. Who the heck is Kate Gosselin?  If you’re anything like the Admins here, you probably have no idea.


Kate and Jon Gosselin became famous because Kate gave birth to a litter of children.  After her lucky (?) uterus managed to pump out 8 kids, they did what any normal parent would do– shopped for a network and sponsors so they’d never have to work again.

After some hard negotiation, they formed their relationship with Discovery Network and shot several seasons of Jon and Kate plus Eight.  As the show went on, people began to note that Kate was…for lack of a better word…a bitch.  She was nasty to just about everyone.  She treated the kids like they were unruly props for her television show.  She pretended to be a clean freak when in fact she was just being controlling and mean.  She’d freak out and scream if her toddlers got dirty while playing.  She treated her husband like he was either the 9th child or her servant in waiting.  Do you want some examples of her being mean?  Google it.  There’s a ton.  No need to waste real estate here.

So, around 2009, Kate was riding the celebrity wave and she was gaining a few fans and even more haters.  Why?  Because she’s a bitch, we’ve already covered that.  In fact, she was named one of the most hated women many times.  Additionally, people were pissed off that this women was getting rich while pimping….errr…..using her children.  You see, kids on Reality TV are not protected by the Screen Actors Guild because reality TV is not considered to be acting.  There is no protection for their earnings.  Kate was free to burn through the money getting plastic surgery, driving sports cars, taking vacations with her body guard, spending weekends in NYC…whatever her heart desired.

The kids are not legally entitled to any of the money unless Kate takes it upon herself to give them some.  Based on her well-documented, selfish personality, and coupled with the fact that she doesn’t seem to like her kids at all, it’s unlikely they are going to see a dime.  The kids are the only reason Kate is famous.  She has sold out their childhoods and their privacy while she personally reaps the rewards.


And that made some people mad.


Be like Bill

So, groups of those people began to criticize her and express their feelings on blogs.  The people who commented were mostly women.  Some of them were extremely opinionated. Gosselin’s alleged misuse of the children was so heated that before long, new blogs were created to discuss the blogs that criticized Kate.  If you have ever heard of a blog war then you get the idea.  Yes, groups of women made blogs to talk about other blogs and the main point of contention (initially) was whether you loved or hated Kate Gosselin. (BTW- note we’re not mentioning Jon.  They divorced after Kate choose her relationship with her body guard and her desire for fame over her marriage.)

One of those blogs was one called “Reality Without Apologies” and the owner was someone who went by the name of Lisa Knight.  This was one of the edgier blogs and people were free to speak their minds.  (A lot like ViaViewFiles)  In short time, many tight relationships were formed.  The women were full of spunk, humor and witty banter.  They made fun of Kate Gosselin and they laughed at her fans.  Sometimes they toed the line, but overall, they were just 20 or so women chatting and having fun.
 In fact, you can still read their comments right here:


James McGibney at desk
Kate opened a Twitter account and in short time, people began tweeting to her directly.  She’s a very polarizing woman and the fact is, most people think she’s awful.  Her fan base consists of a few paid staffers and some mentally unstable people such as @CjWhodunit, a woman who’s been featured right here on this blog.  The vast majority of celebrities simply ignore their critics.  They block them and focus on positive things and interacting with fans.  But, Kate is not a real celebrity.  She has no class, no self-control, and she couldn’t help herself.  She started fighting, pouting, whining, licking her wounds then playing the victim.  She didn’t win any points with her Twitter activity and she would have been wise to listen to her handlers.  Either ignore the haters or get off Twitter.

So what did she do?  She teamed up with Bullyville AKA James McGibney.  Kate wanted her haters exposed.  After McGibney posted her whining blog post on his silly site, she tweeted that he was her “knight in bullyproof armor”…

knight in Bullyproof ...
James McGibney did no research.  He didn’t bother to look into the facts.  He didn’t consider that maybe people had a valid reason to be upset with Kate Gosselin.  He didn’t check to see if there were CPS reports (there were several) or that the vast majority of the public didn’t care for this woman or that she was just a nasty person.  He didn’t care that Kate was a public figure and the women had a right to criticize her – a right to speak freely.  Nope, James McGibney saw a blonde woman in the public eye with manufactured breasts who appeared to have a lot of money and he thought to himself, “JACKPOT”– and he got to work censoring by demolishing her critics and getting the media attention he desperately craves.  He contacted the media and Radar Online did a story on him.  McGibney never read the comment section to see that most people thought he was an idiot to defend Kate Gosselin and he had no legal right to try to stop women from speaking their minds.

211 214
McGibney made the rounds telling people that he was going to out these haters.  In one news story he said he had contacted am employer who was shocked by the activity on Twitter.  McGibney escalated his rhetoric and soon claimed there were DEATH THREATS against Kate.  Let’s look at one example:


Hollie McKay
Tweets to Gosselin that attracted the attention of the team included

…“You are a piece of sh*t and I hope your kids get hit by a car in ur care,” and “people like you are a disgrace to the human race.”

“After seeing repeated threats against Kate’s life we decided to get involved. Understandably celebrities put themselves in the spotlight and should be prepared for their fair share of hatred, but when it comes to implied death threats, no one deserves that,” McGibney said. “Especially a mother of eight who is taking care of her kids all by herself.”


3-11-13 BV has SEALS
So, yes, telling someone what you think of them is the same as death threat, in McGibney’s opinion, that warranted hunting down the woman responsible and attempting to ruin her life.  We suspect Kate never went to the police because there was nothing illegal in the posting.  Since when is wishing something interpreted as a death threat?  Oh yeah in McGibneyville.


There was also a lot of outcry over a photoshopped picture of Kate on a stick.  While the picture is (probably) in very poor taste, it’s important that we explain the meaning. Kate’s biggest Twitter fan is someone that goes by the screen name “Fired Up For Kate”…this person claims to be a woman and often says very strange, personal things to Kate.  One day she was posting that she was on her way to Kate’s house.  Her tweets were very creepy.  (It was that day that someone Tweeted “Remember Selena” in reference to a singer who was murdered by her #1 fan.)  The picture depicts a cartoon character with a necklace bearing the letters F.U.F.K…representing Fired Up For Kate– the crazy fan.  The character has Kate impaled on a stick for “Something on a Stick Day.”  It was never intended to be a threat toward Kate.  It was a warning that she ought to be more careful about her crazy fans.

BV crazier than you
But, his stories didn’t stop there.  They continued to grow until he reached this whopper:
 The hub of the so-called Kate Haters was Reality Without Apologies, a popular blog for reality TV fans.  It was there that McGibney found what he calls the most vicious bullying he’d seen yet.  There were calls for beheading, raping and murdering Gosselin…
So…yeah.. McGibney said that a group of women were threatening to RAPE and BEHEAD Kate Gosselin.  He had no proof of this claim.  He just threw it out there and no one bothered to challenge it.  Again, Kate didn’t call the police because it never happened – it was fabricated by James McGibney.


Pro Tip: If anyone threatens to rape and behead you, please contact your local law enforcement.

Now, let’s get back to James McGibney targeting the wildly popular blog where 20 women chatted every day.  Who were these women?  They were simply moms, grandmas and a few younger girls.  They had no crazy skeletons in their closets.  They were outspoken, had opinions and they were using their right to FREE SPEECH.  James McGibney determined that they were enemies and he was about to make war.  He immediately started buying domains in the names of the women he knew. 

Then he somehow managed to gain control of the blog.  We are unsure if he purchased control or simply bullied the owner into handing it over to him.  He then worked with his “team” …which consisted of women from other blogs who already hated these women.  They went through the IPs and using James McGibney’s highly trained computer skillz that he learned in the Marines before the internet was even created …they claimed that they matched IP’s with real names.  From there, James McGibney began to publically post names, addresses, pictures as well as logs of comments that he had decided to assign to certain people.  He purchased more domains, set up more webpages, and he used his Twitter account to pass these links along.



The first problem with this situation is that James McGibney actually has no ability to determine names attached to an IP.  I know…he told the judge in court that he had been trained to do that.  It’s hard to believe that this internet crusader would stand in front of a judge and LIE, but that’s exactly what he did.  There were no subpoenas to any ISPs because there was no case and no legal action in place.  James was simply making guesses.  If he thought Mary Sue Jones lived in Alabama, then he would assign every blog comment from Alabama to her.  Very technical…except that it’s not.


McGibney = Expert Faggot
Of the reports released by James McGibney, several have identified the wrong people.  All of them contain errors in the way they are assembled.  And, probably the biggest problem, NO ONE GIVES A SHIT.

BV allistair
James wasn’t done there.  He took to Twitter to attempt to silence the critics of Kate Gosselin.  He took issue with a few in particular.  We are not going to name them because James McGibney has already taken it upon himself to bring a spotlight to these people.  Instead, we’ll show you a series of DM’s and Tweets James made that hilariously highlight how obsessed James became with a group of women who simply wanted to gossip about a reality personality.  He wanted them to shut up.  He wanted their names.  He was willing to swear and scream and threaten everyone until he got his way.

3-13-13 BV employer threats

James claimed he was an expert at IPs and he claims he knew who every person was behind every account.  Then why was he sending threatening DMs to people demanding that they out their friends?

Why did he tweet a $200 reward for the identity of one of these women?

BV offers $200 for chance's name

Why was James so upset when certain women refused to SHUT UP and get off the internet?  I mean…he got really really upset and starting throwing full-blown man tantrums.

James McGibney went so far as to name some of these women in the most ridiculous lawsuit asking that the Judge silence them.  In the end, The Judge slapped James McGIbney with $1.3 million in sanctionsand lawyer fees for abusing the Court system to silence people.  His behavior netted McGibney a permanent suspension from Twitter.  The kicker– those women are still on Twitter and still talking about Kate Gosselin.  James McGibney is permanently banned from twitter and owes $1.3 million for his abuses.  That’s gotta sting, huh, James?

While there’s a lot more juicy details to this little story, this is an overview and a cautionary tale.  If you’re a former marine and you’re building a name for yourself, maybe it’s not a great idea to team up with a hated reality star and then invest the next few years of your life fighting with a bunch of women who don’t like her.


BV getting peed on


And that’s the bottom line, ’cause Stone Cold said so!




Did anyone else know that violent white supremacist / Nazi Jason Lee Van Dyke was caught in the act plotting to commit a mass school shooting at Michigan State University?  He was arrested in the possession of 5 handguns, an AR-15 assault rifle, and hundreds of rounds of ammunition.  Stay tuned for a very important article!

Tug O’ War Develops In Federal Court Regarding Testimony Of Accused Pedophile / Revenge Pornographer James McGibney!!


, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Good day, eh?  Well not so good if you are revenge pornographer / accused pedophile James McGibney (who we don’t like) of Round Rock, Texas, who (at long last), will finally be questioned under oath regarding more than 6 1/2 years’ worth of wild, outlandish court filings and public claims that he has made regarding your American Heroes & Honorary Admins of the BV Files Neal Rauhauser, Thomas Retzlaff, Lane Lipton, Lora Lusher, @Miss Anon News, Jennifer D’Alessandro, Jane Does 1 – 5, and much, much more!!


Or will he?

It seems as if the Federal Government is attempting to weigh in and prevent this.  Will they be successful?  Not a chance!  But the drama unfolding is pretty exciting and it is all 100% VERIFIED!!





As many of you, our teeming MILLIONS of readers, listeners, and supporters will recall, our blog server is hosted overseas in lovely Dubai, UAE. While being hosted in Dubai has numerous advantages…


Bulletproof host 4 Bulletproof host 2 Bulletproof host 3

…it does come with more than a few hassles.  One big hassle that you, our teeming MILLIONS of readers, listeners, and supporters are well aware of is the annual Ramadan take-over of this blog by our ‘neighbors’ in ISIS who are co-located on our server.  This has lead to accusations of “death threats”, claims of car bombs, and fatwas being made against your American Heroes & Honorary Admins of the BV Files Neal Rauhauser, Thomas Retzlaff, and Jeffrey Dorrell by reputable lawyers like John Morgan of Beaumont, Texas.  CHECK IT OUT!!


And claims of ‘death threats’ made by equally reputable private investigators such as Philip Klein of Nederland, Texas.



Such lunacy only results in a great deal of unnecessary work for the FBI and the super secret grand juries that Morgan, Philip Klein, and James McGibney (who we don’t like) constantly blather on about that they claim are busy investigating Retzlaff “and others” for various and sundry misdeeds of no import whatsoever.

The fact that neither Rauhauser, Retzlaff or Dorrell have anything to do with this blog makes no difference to the mind of a vexatious crazy person like Morgan who not only is an admitted perjurer, but is literally a drug addled crazy person who was ORDERED into mental health / substance abuse counseling TWICE by the State Bar of Texas as a direct result of grievances filed by Retzlaff against him!

In any event, in order to keep our ISIS neighbors happy, we have agreed to post stuff from them from time to time.  So in keeping with recent events involving reports of civil unrest across America, we bring you the following special report.  CHECK IT OUT!!



Social distancing?  No.  But plenty of face masks!



Syria sends advisors to aid US rebels

WASHINGTON — As the United States works through its immense internal challenges with human rights, equality, and government use of force, Syrian president Bashar al-Assad seeks to help the US in the same way the US helped during the recent Syrian civil war.

“We’re sending advisors from our elite special operations units to, you know, help foster peace,” Assad told reporters while hiding a smirk. “I can’t tell you how valuable it was to have a foreign influence stoking the fires during a period of violent unrest. The least we can do is return the favor.”

Assad’s aides exchanged high fives in a symbol of solidarity.

Syrian peacekeeping support for rebels in the US includes combat training and air cover, necessary features of any peace effort and not an attempt to foster chaos or regime change for their own interests.

Assad emphasizes that the American and Syrian civil conflicts have their differences.

“Sometimes you have a country that values the status quo over freedom and individual human life, and when people finally speak up for change, they’re met with unreasonable force, so both sides feel required to escalate,” Assad noted.

“And sometimes you have a shitshow like America, it can go either way, really.”

Intelligence personnel across the Middle East are closely monitoring events in the United States, as civil unrest continues spreading in the aftermath of the death of 46-year-old George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police officers. Officials in the Middle East have expressed concern the so-called American Spring could further destabilize North America.

“Say what you will about their government, the United States is strategic terrain—not just in the Western Hemisphere, but across the globe,” Abu Hasan Mahmoud, an analyst with Egypt’s General Intelligence Service, said. “They are a major exporter of popular music, cinema, and fast food. But, it is not just Hollywood and McDonald’s; we love the American people and want to see them prosper.”

“It’s important to remember,” continued Mahmoud, “we can’t risk this craziness bleeding over to Canada or Mexico.”

Officials in the region have long kept an eye on the United States. Longstanding concerns that the volatile mix of unemployment, a problematic record of civil rights, and a charismatic national leader widely seen as unstable could create a powder keg were validated last month as protests and riots broke out across the country.

Not everyone is convinced of the magnanimity of the intelligence services. Some see darker and more nefarious motivations at work. Ahmed al-Mostafa is a civil rights lawyer from Alexandria and expressed skepticism of the intelligence services’ intentions.

“They are not concerned about the well-being of the American people,” said al-Mostafa. “They only see opportunity and a chance to prop up some tin pot dictator who will just do whatever is good for Egypt. This is nothing more than a scheme to exchange blood for oily fast food.”

Sources in Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Syria have confirmed they are also closely monitoring events in the United States.

“No one wants to talk about it publicly,” said a Lebanese intelligence officer who requested to remain anonymous, “but these people just aren’t suited to govern themselves. They need help from more advanced societies.”





Could it be true, that current Nazi / former attorney Jason Lee Van Dyke is accused of being involved in a July 2016 political assassination?  According to newly filed court records – yes.  CHECK IT OUT!!



Petitioner's Amended Rule 404 Notice


Keep in mind that this is not the first time that Van Dyke has been involved in a plot to murder people.









Does anyone care about the tears of a Nazi?




And how did super special agent Wicevich respond?  CHECK IT OUT!!!





A federal appeals court has rejected adult film star Stormy Daniels defamation suit against President Donald Trump and upheld the award of sanctions.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Friday, July 31, 2020, the lower court’s decision from October 2018 to dismiss the case and award President Trump mandatory sanctions and attorney’s fees pursuant to the Texas anti-SLAPP law!

U.S. District Judge S. James Otero had ruled that Trump’s tweet at the center of the case was “rhetorical hyperbole” protected by the First Amendment instead of the defamation alleged.

Daniels, born Stephanie Clifford, alleged that she was threatened in a Las Vegas casino parking lot in 2011 after agreeing to cooperate with a magazine that intended to publish a story on her alleged intimate relationship with Trump in 2006.

Daniels sued over an April 18, 2018, tweet in which Trump said the sketch of a man who allegedly threatened Clifford in 2011 was a “total con job.”

Trump has frequently denounced the 9th Circuit as a bastion of liberalism and has claimed its rulings are driven by political bias against him.  However, the three-judge panel that ruled unanimously in Trump’s favor on the libel suit is composed of Democratic appointees: Clinton nominees Sidney Thomas and Kim Wardlaw and Obama nominee Jacqueline Nguyen

The court’s opinion Friday also addressed a more arcane legal issue about a special procedure Trump’s lawyers used to knock Daniels’ suit out at an early stage.  A Los Angeles-based federal court trial judge ruled that Texas law applied in the case and that Trump’s lawyers could avail themselves of a state law there that discourages libel lawsuits about matters of public controversy and debate.

Because of a ruling from the federal appeals court that covers Texas, federal courts in that state don’t apply the special Texas statute, often called an anti-SLAPP law.  However, the 9th Circuit does apply those kinds of laws.

Asked about Friday’s ruling, Daniel’s attorney Clark Brewster faulted that aspect of the decision, arguing that the 9th Circuit should have deferred to the court that handles Texas, the 5th Circuit.

“To reach the result set forth in its ‘unpublished decision’ the 9th Circuit had to break with established rules of comity,” Brewster said. “Ms. Clifford has directed us to proceed to seek further review by the 9th Circuit, en banc.  If that effort fails we will likely seek review by the Supreme Court.”  (Unfortunately for him, Tom Retzlaff is already there first and his case is the one that will decide this issue for the entire country!)


The BIG TAKE-AWAY from the 9th Circuit’s decision is this:

The TCPA is indistinguishable from California’s law in all material respects.



As many of you, our teeming MILLIONS of readers, listeners, and supporters will recall, the California anti-SLAPP statute has been around for almost 30 years.  Specifically, in 1992 California enacted Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16, a statute intended to frustrate SLAPPs by providing a quick and inexpensive defense.  It provides for a special motion that a defendant can file at the outset of a lawsuit to strike a complaint when it arises from conduct that falls within the rights of petition or free speech.

The statute expressly applies to any writing or speech made in connection with an issue under consideration or review by a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding, or any other official proceeding authorized by law, but there is no requirement that the writing or speech be promulgated directly to the official body.  It also applies to speech in a public forum about an issue of public interest and to any other petition or speech conduct about an issue of public interest.

In the case involving your American Hero & Honorary Admin of the BV Files Thomas Retzlaff and the $100 million defamation / SLAPP lawsuit filed by Nazi / pedo guy Jason Lee Van Dyke, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals held in Klocke v. Watson, 936 F.3d 240, 244–47 (5th Cir. 2019) that the Texas anti-SLAPP law (called the Texas Citizens Participation Act or TCPA) did not apply in federal court because of something called the Erie doctrine.


FUN FACT: The Erie doctrine is a fundamental legal doctrine of civil procedure in the United States which mandates that a federal court called upon to resolve a dispute not directly implicating a federal question (most commonly when sitting in diversity jurisdiction, but also when applying supplemental jurisdiction to claims factually related to a federal question or in an adversary proceeding in bankruptcy) must apply state substantive law.

The doctrine follows from the Supreme Court landmark decision in Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins (1938).  The case overturned Swift v. Tyson, which allowed federal judges sitting in a state to ignore the common law local decisions of state courts in the same state in diversity actions.

There are two main objectives of the Erie decision: (1) to discourage forum shopping among litigants, and (2) to avoid inequitable administration of the laws.  Broadly speaking, the second objective is sometimes referred to as “vertical uniformity” and is rooted in the idea that in a given state, the outcome of the litigation should not be grossly different just because a litigant filed a claim in a state court rather than a federal court or vice versa.

The Erie doctrine today applies regardless of how the federal court may hear a state claim.  Whether the federal court encounters a state law issue in diversity jurisdiction, supplemental jurisdiction, or bankruptcy jurisdiction, the federal court must honor state common law when deciding state law issues.

In effect, when the U.S. Constitution does not control and Congress has not legislated (or cannot legislate) on a topic, then the laws of the states necessarily govern and state judge-made rules are equally binding on the federal courts as state statutes.


DOUBLE FUN FACT:  The Erie case involved a fundamental question of federalism and the jurisdiction of federal courts in the United States.  In 1789, the Congress passed a law still in effect today called the Rules of Decision Act (28 U.S.C. § 1652), which states that the laws of a state furnish the rules of decision for a federal court sitting in that state.  Thus, a federal court in Texas, hearing a case based on diversity (as opposed to a federal question), has to follow the laws of the applicable state in resolving a case before it.  Which is why state anti-SLAPP laws should apply in federal courts in those states that have such laws.


In a nut shell, the 9th Circuit held that the district court correctly concluded under the Erie doctrine that the motion to dismiss procedures of the Texas Citizens Participation Act (TCPA) — Texas’s version of an anti-SLAPP law — apply in federal court.

We have long held that analogous procedures in California’s anti-SLAPP law apply in federal court, and the TCPA is indistinguishable from California’s law in all material respects.

Though we recognize the Fifth Circuit recently held that the TCPA does not apply in federal court, the reasoning of the Fifth Circuit’s opinion cannot be reconciled with our circuit’s anti-SLAPP precedent.  We are bound to follow our own precedent, which requires us to apply the TCPA.


Here is the decision from the 9th Circuit:



Clifford v Trump - 9th Circuit Opinion - 7-31-2020


So why is this a big win for Retzlaff?  Because it further cements in stone the split among the various U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals as to whether or not state anti-SLAPP laws apply in federal court.  And it specifically applies with a circuit split as to how one state’s anti-SLAPP law applies in federal courts.

The attorney for Nazi punk Van Dyke is Marc Randazza, who is also a white supremacist that is a disgusting sexual pervert who likes to steal money from his clients.  Randazza is attempting to argue that the U.S. Supreme Court should deny review of the Retzlaff v Van Dyke case.  Randazza claims that that no case could ever helpfully address the applicability of state anti-SLAPP laws in federal court because “each state’s statute has its own distinctive features.”  See page 3 of the opposition brief below.



Van Dyke Brief in Opposition to Petition for Certiorari


As recently explained to us by Some Random Person We’ve Never Heard Of Before,

Their distinctions make little difference to the circuit split.  The problem is not that different circuits applying the same legal rule to different state provisions have reached different results.  That could be no problem at all.  The problem is that different circuits apply different legal rules to similar, if not completely identical, state provisions to reach contradictory results.

As the 9th Circuit recognized, it employs a version of “conflict preemption” analysis between federal and state rules while those circuits on the other side of the split use a version of “field preemption” analysis.  The decision from the 9th Circuit in the Clifford v Trump case only further highlights this problem.

These dramatically different approaches lead to conflicting results which only the Supreme Court can resolve.


As you can see, Your American Hero & Honorary Admin of the BV Files Thomas Retzlaff has the continued support and assistance from most of America’s largest and influential media organizations.  That support is only going to increase as the case gets further teed up for arguments before our nation’s highest court. 



SCOTUS Amicus brief - Retzlaff v Van Dyke - 7-8-2020



Already Retzlaff has the love and support of our President having recently met with his staff members at The White House during a January visit before the virus rolled into town in order to plan out this Supreme Court case in which the University of Virginia’s School of Law Supreme Court Litigation Clinic is heavily involved.

Has James McGibney (who we don’t like) ever set foot inside of The White House?  NO!


Courtesy: White House Press Office



US Supreme Court Petition - Van Dyke v Retzlaff


One thing that will never not be funny is that it looks like Marc Randazza will have ZERO opportunities at arguing this case before the U.S. Supreme Court.  Why is that, you ask?  Well, it is because Randazza was recently hit with yet more State Bar discipline for wildly unethical – and illegal – conduct.  You see, Marc Randazza is a thief who likes to steal money from his clients.  While a recently filed Report & Recommendation from a Florida Supreme Court referee recommended that Randazza be placed on probation for his crimes, we have it on super good authority that the Florida State Bar will be requesting that the Florida Supreme Court overrule that recommendation and will be seeking disbarment.  CHECK IT OUT!!




FL State Bar v Marc Randazza - Report of Referee


The U.S. Supreme Court has understandably very high standards when it comes to ethical conduct of those allowed to argue before it.  Nazis, sexual perverts, and people who think it is a good idea to steal from their clients and double-cross them are totally NOT WELCOME.

We will, of course, keep you all updated on any further developments.





This was just filed with the U.S. Supreme Court this afternoon.  CHECK IT OUT!!




Retzlaff Reply brief











It looks like Van Dyke is about to get poured out of federal court and any chance at winning his $100 million defamation SLAPP lawsuit against Retzlaff because it turns out (big surprise) that Van Dyke has absolutely NO EVIDENCE to support his claims!!

This, of course, is the same BIG PROBLEM that James McGibney (who we don’t like) had when he filed his series of SLAPP lawsuits against Retzlaff in which he, too, made a bunch of wild and outlandish claims.

So now Van Dyke is having to respond to a NO EVIDENCE MOTION FOR FINAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT.



ECF 194 - Retzlaff's mtn for summary judgment




August 14, 2020:


A new NO EVIDENCE summary judgment motion has just been filed, shortly after Van Dyke dismissed several of his nonsense claims against Retzlaff.  CHECK IT OUT!!




ECF 196 - D's Amend Mtn for No Evidence SJ


ECF 198 - Agreed Mtn for Entry of Stipulation for Partial Dismissal





Oh, and just look at what was filed in Van Dyke’s criminal case yesterday:  The Fort Worth Court of Appeals will shortly be issuing its order DENYING Van Dyke’s appeal and affirming his criminal conviction for filing false police reports as a part of an insurance fraud scheme involving a vehicle burglary and the theft of guns.  CHECK IT OUT!!







“In our judicial system, ‘the public has a right to every man’s evidence.’” Trump v. Vance, 591 U.S. ___, ___, 2020 WL 3848062, at * 4 (July 9, 2020).




James McGibney (who we don’t like) is a revenge pornographer who lives in Round Rock, Texas, at this house right here:

Since around 2012, McGibney has been involved with the sexual blackmail of young girls and their families through the posting of the intimate photographs of these young girls and defamatory comments about them on his website.


Tweet for internationally known news reporter


McGibney is a close associate and supporter of former attorney Jason Lee Van Dyke, who is the leader of the Proud Boys white supremacist street gang.  In fact, McGibney is sooo close to Van Dyke and is such a big supporter that Van Dyke listed McGIbney as being his “key witness” in a $100 million defamation / SLAPP lawsuit that he filed against your American Hero & Honorary Admin of the BV Files Thomas Retzlaff!  CHECK IT OUT!!


Van Dyke’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a) Initial Disclosures



Van Dyke’s response to an Interrogatory question



In response to Van Dyke’s identification of James McGibney (who we don’t like) as a person with knowledge of relevant facts and as a trial witness on his behalf, Retzlaff and his lawyers at the Hanszen Laporte law firm in Houston issued a deposition subpoena so that they can question McGibney under oath about these claims.



Once McGibney found out that there was a subpoena for him, what did this man who claims to be a former Marine do?  Why he went on the run and hide out from the process servers!!





Then the strangest thing of all happened – the US Attorney’s Office filed a motion seeking to quash this deposition subpoena.  Specifically, Aimee Cooper claims that, because McGibney is an “FBI witness”, he is somehow immunized from having to be questioned under oath about anything that he has said or claimed.  CHECK IT OUT!!


ECF 188 - Govts mtn to quash McGibney subpoena


ECF 189 - Response in Opp to USA's mtn to quash



Of course, the usual knuckleheads from the peanut gallery chime in thinking that something super grand has only just now been revealed…


Seriously? After more than 6 1/2 years of your claimed “investigation”??



FUN FACT:  Aimee Cooper has only been employed by the Department of Justice since September 2019.  Before that she spent about 3 years working as an employment law attorney for the Department of Defense.  Earlier she had spent some time as a Navy JAG officer.  Aimee is a graduate of Creighton University, which, as everybody knows is ranked No. 133 (tie) in Best Law Schools by US News & World Report.

DOUBLE FUN FACT:  Stetson University is ranked No. 105.

Make of that what you will, dear reader.


The problem for Aimee Cooper is that, for more than 33 years, the U.S. Supreme Court has consistently held that,

Where the evidence consists of the testimony of individuals whose memory might be faulty or who, in fact, might be perjurers or persons motivated by malice, vindictiveness, intolerance, prejudice, or jealousy, the individual’s right to show that it is untrue depends on the rights of confrontation and cross-examination.


And Retzlaff responded with a motion seeking to compel McGibney’s deposition.


ECF 193 - D's motion to compel McGibney Depo


Furthermore, it looks like, regardless as to what happens in the federal court, McGibney will have to appear anyways for a deposition in that Texas LOLsuit he filed against Retzlaff in Fort Worth (you guys remember, the one where McGibney was hit with over $1.3 million in sanctions and attorney’s fees).  Judge Cosby has told everyone that a final trial on the matter will be taking place in September.  Furthermore, Judge Cosby has made it abundantly clear that additional TCPA sanctions are definately on the table.

So because Neal Rauhauser had to appear at a deposition, so does James McGibney.  CHECK IT OUT!!



Notice of McGibney deposition - 7-29-2020





So James “Jimmy the PissBoy” McGibney blinked and filed a motion to quash his deposition.  He claims that the only issue left to be decided is attorney’s fees.  He is wrong.  Judge Cosby has made it clear that TCPA sanctions are on the table (something having to do with the word “mandatory sanctions” in the statute).

McGibney also claims he should not have to testify because he is a super secret FBI witness and that the FBI is investigating Retzlaff and Rauhauser for the past seven years and that nobody should ever get to question McGibney under oath about his claims.





McGibney's 2nd motion to quash (no exhibits)


AUGUST 27, 2020:


This was just filed moments ago your American Hero & Honorary Admin of the BV Files Houston attorney Jeffrey Dorrell in the Texas LOLsuit regarding McGibney’s attempt at avoiding having to testify under oath.  It is quite impressive.  CHECK IT OUT!!



Rauhauser's Response to McGibney's mtn to quash





This is what is going to cook McGibney’s goose.  This is why anti-SLAPP sanctions are still on the table.  This is the end of James McGibney (who we don’t like).







Rauhauser Response to McGibney's motion to quash GoDaddy SDT





This is turning into quite a dog fight.  For our sake’s, we here at the BV Files hope that whoever is driving this thing knows just where the heck they are going!


Cpt. Brittany is flying the plane




Actually, no, it is much, much worse than that!  CHECK IT OUT!!


Some Random Person We’ve Never Heard Of Before outside the headquarters in Scottsdale, AZ with a records subpoena





GoDaddy Subpoena - McGibney v Retzlaff - 8-14-2020



Amend Notice of McGibney Deposition


When asked for a comment, Some Random Person We’ve Never Heard Of Before said:

Good luck trying to stop this, bitch.  Hey, maybe Walker Wicevich and the FBI will file a motion to quash!



AUGUST 18, 2020:


James McGibney (who we don’t like) has filed a motion seeking to block the GoDaddy subpoena.  It appears that his attorney, Evan Stone of Denton, Texas, really gave McGibney his moneys worth on this bit of drug fueled nonsense.  CHECK IT OUT!!



McGibney's mtn to quash GoDaddy subpoena (no exhibits)


And this is an interesting exhibit that was attached to this motion:



There are several problems with the statements made in this “affidavit.”  The first and foremost being that Philip Klein is a lover of animals.  And when we say “lover of animals” we truly mean it in the biblical sense.  CHECK IT OUT!!



Secondly, Philip Klein is a liar.


Philip Klein really does have sex with farm animals – at least that is according to sources close to the investigation (which consist solely of the voices in our head).


IN addition to his false denial of sex with farm animals, Klein also tells other lies, as well.

Claim made by Philip Klein in a Client Services Agreement / contract he signed



And then we have this lie by Klein right here in which Klein ginned up some phony subpoena trying to scare people into thinking Klein had obtained information regarding a Gamil account pertaining to Carolyn Joy Dean-Pillutla of Allen, Texas (who goes by the Twitter handle @CJWhodunit (





And, of course, we have other examples of Philip Klein’s lies, such as those he told in the DeOrr Kunz missing child case in Idaho, which resulted in him being sued for defamation.

Klein was also sued in San Antonio for making false police reports that resulted in two people being arrested.  Klein and his insurance company were forced to pay out nearly $1 million over a year ago to settle that case.







Yes, it has only been more than 3 1/2 years!





Actually, this is not what “barratry” really means, legally speaking. But Klein is a drug addled mentally retarded person.





Unfortunately for Philip Klein and James McGibney (who we don’t like) in their rush to tell lies and commit Aggravated Perjury, they forgot one very important thing:  This information – the real information – was already disclosed long, long ago!






What happens next is anyone’s guess.  But one thing is certain:  McGibney will be questioned under oath one way or another, and when he is, we will bring it to you all in living color!



Well, this article has gone on long enough.  So we hope that you, our teeming MILLIONS of readers, listeners, and supporters are all doing well and staying safe.  After all, without you guys, there would be no need for us to do what we do.


And that’s the bottom line, ’cause Stone Cold said so!

error: Content is protected !!