Tags
Andy Campbell Huffington Post, Gavin McInnes Proud Boys, Jason Lee Van Dyke, John Kinsman, Kristin Brady State Bar of Texas, Maxwell Hare, Michael Shackleford Director of Public Safety, Oak Point Texas, Proud Boys lawsuit, Talib Kweli, The Proud Boys, Thomas Retzlaff Hanszen-Laporte Law Firm, Van Dyke v Shackleford, Van Dyke v. Retzlaff, Walker Wicevich FBI Phoenix
Good day, eh. Well, not so good if you are Michael Shackleford, Director of Public Safety for the City of Oak Point, Texas, who just got sued by Nazi / Proud Boys gang leader Jason Lee Van Dyke. Apparently there is some kind of conspiracy going on and Van Dyke is not at all happy about it. So he is going to sue everyone in sight. CHECK IT OUT!!
*** CLICK ON IMAGE TO VIEW ON YOUR MOBILE DEVICE ***
Van Dyke lawsuit against Oak Point PD
FUN FACT: In the deranged mind of Jason Lee Van Dyke, filing complaints with the police about him threatening to murder you (which resulted in him being arrested) means that you are in a conspiracy and you must be punished.
In December 2018, the Denton County District Attorney’s office received a statement from your American Hero & Honorary Admin of the BV Files Tom Retzlaff, whom Van Dyke had sued for defamation, claiming Van Dyke had threatened to kill Retzlaff, prompting Van Dyke’s arrest for felony death threats. CHECK IT OUT!!
Unfortunately for Van Dyke, when he sent off this email, he hit the “reply all” button and it was delivered to:
- Linda Acevado, Chief Disciplinary Counsel for the State Bar of Texas
- Kristin Brady, State Bar prosecutor for North Texas
- Andy Campbell, Senior Reporter for the Huffington Post
- John Council, Senior Editor for Texas Lawyer magazine
- Jeff Dorrell, Senior Partner of Hanszen Laporte law firm in Houston
- Walker Wicevich, super Special Agent for the FBI in Phoenix
His social media posts include racist and hateful remarks, as well as threats of violence toward people.
Very recent tweet from attorney Jason Van Dyke
Van Dyke Facebook post – April 20 2017
This is the inside Van Dyke’s home
Jason Van Dyke dating profile on the Storm Front website under the forum headings: White Singles / Talk / Handsome Men!
So what are you supposed to do when you are confronted online with this kind of a social media user?
Allen Kay, an American advertising executive, coined the phrase for a security campaign introduced in 2002 for the NY Metropolitan Transportation Authority
And what did all of that seeing and saying end up doing? CHECK IT OUT!!
Courtesy of the Denton County Sheriff – Jan 8 2019
Texas Penal Code § 36.06. Obstruction or Retaliation
(a) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally or knowingly harms or threatens to harm another by an unlawful act:
(1) in retaliation for or on account of the service or status of another as a:
(A) public servant, witness, prospective witness, or informant; or
(B) person who has reported or who the actor knows intends to report the occurrence of a crime; or
(2) to prevent or delay the service of another as a:
(A) public servant, witness, prospective witness, or informant; or
(B) person who has reported or who the actor knows intends to report the occurrence of a crime.
….
(c) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree, except that the offense is a felony of the second degree if:
(1) the victim of the offense was harmed or threatened because of the victim’s service or status as a juror; or
(2) the actor’s conduct is described by Subsection (a-1) and results in the bodily injury of a public servant or a member of a public servant’s family or household.
FUN FACT: To obtain a third-degree-felony conviction for retaliation, the State is required to prove that Van Dyke intentionally or knowingly threatened to harm Retzlaff by an unlawful act —here, violence and murder— in retaliation for or on account of his service or status as a prospective witness, informant, or person who reported the occurrence of a crime.
DOUBLE FUN FACT: One of the purposes of the retaliation statute is to encourage a “certain class of citizens” to perform vital public duties without fear of retribution. Section 36.06, however, does not require the threatened retaliatory harm be imminent, nor does it require the actor to intend to carry out the threat. Also, the fact that the party threatened was not present when the threat was made is no defense. Thus, threats made via social media are against the law.
Jason Lee Van Dyke, the leader and attorney for the Proud Boys white supremacist gang, is clearly a stupid moron whose brain has likely been fried on account of syphilis.
As a result, he has gone into Full Retard Mode with his frivolous and vexatious litigation. In his LOLsuit against Chief Shackleford, Van Dyke claims that his “rights” were violated because he was “wrongfully” arrested because he claims the police had no jurisdiction to arrest him. Specifically, Van Dyke claims in paragraph 6.8 that:
Shackleford knowingly and intentionally made a false statement in an affidavit, to wit, that an offense occurred in Denton County, and did so with reckless disregard to the truth.
If Van Dyke’s brain was not addled by the effects of his mental disabilities and/or substance abuse, he would have know that “Offenses committed wholly or in part outside this State, under circumstances that give this State jurisdiction to prosecute the offender, may be prosecuted in any county in which the offender is found or in any county in which an element of the offense occurs.” See Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 13.01.
If one element of the crime occurred in Denton County, venue was proper.
The standard for proving venue is preponderance of the evidence. Thus, venue will lie so long as the defendant, his conduct, his victim, or the fruit of his crime has some relationship to the prosecuting county. The Legislature, through the statutes, has specified the types of contacts that satisfy the “substantial contacts” threshold. Here, so long as one element occurred in Denton County, then there are substantial contacts.
As we noted earlier, the elements of retaliation are (1) intentionally or knowingly, (2) threatening, (3) to harm another, (4) by an unlawful act, (5) in retaliation for or on account of the service or status of another, (6) as a public servant, witness, prospective witness, or informant. Elements five and six occurred in Denton County. Van Dyke’s threats were based on the status and service of Thomas Retzlaff as a witness, prospective witness, or informant, which he attained or fulfilled in Denton County due to the fact that the state bar disciplinary proceedings against Van Dyke were being conducted in Denton County, Texas.
In Texas, a “warrant of arrest” is a written order from a magistrate, directed to a peace officer or some other person specially named, commanding him to take the body of the person accused of an offense, to be dealt with according to law. A magistrate may issue a warrant of arrest or a summons when any person shall make oath before the magistrate that another has committed some offense against the laws of the State.
Lastly,
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 13.37 – Obstruction or Retaliation
An offense under Section 36.06(a)(1), Penal Code, may be prosecuted in any county in which:
(1) the harm occurs; or
(2) the threat to do harm originated or was received.
Because Van Dyke threatened harm to a witness in the state bar disciplinary case that is currently pending in Denton County, the harm occurred in Denton County and Van Dyke may be prosecuted there.
.
Besides, Van Dyke has already pled GUILTY to making violence and murder threats against Retzlaff with regards to the Denton County state bar disciplinary proceedings – an important fact that Nazi boy Van Dyke seems to have forgotten; thus, his federal LOLsuit against the police chief is dead on arrival.
*** CLICK ON IMAGE TO VIEW ON YOUR MOBILE DEVICE ***
Exhibit 5 - 3rd Amend Pet - State Bar v Van DykeState Bar v Van Dyke - Agreed Judgment - Case # 201707583 - Retzlaff case
Jason Van Dyke is a Nazi and a lunatic, who has the look of a pedophile – 100% VERIFIED. As the case progresses, we shall keep you updated on developments as they happen.
UPDATE: NOVEMBER 4, 2019
This is what happens when you hire a lawyer who is a mentally deranged drug addict. CHECK IT OUT!!
*** CLICK ON IMAGE TO VIEW ON YOUR MOBILE DEVICE ***
Response to States Supplement Answer for Writ of Habeas Corpus
As our frequent readers know, Van Dyke has filed a $100 million defamation lawsuit against American Hero & Honorary Admin of the BV Files Thomas Retzlaff. Retzlaff and his attorney Jeffrey Dorrell of the Houston, Texas, law firm of Hanszen Laporte, filed an anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss. That motion was denied by the federal judge based upon his belief that anti-SLAPP motions are not allowed in federal courts in Texas.
FUN FACT: A strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) is a lawsuit that is intended to censor, intimidate, and silence critics by burdening them with the cost of a legal defense until they abandon their criticism or opposition. The typical SLAPP plaintiff does not normally expect to win the lawsuit. The plaintiff’s goals are accomplished if the defendant succumbs to fear, intimidation, mounting legal costs, or simple exhaustion and abandons the criticism. A SLAPP may also intimidate others from participating in the debate. A SLAPP is often preceded by a legal threat not unlike the ones Van Dyke’s has expressed via email or social media postings.
Unfortunately for Van Dyke, it is kind of hard to claim you are being defamed over being called a Nazi when you state on Facebook that your political views are Fascist.
— From an exhibit filed in federal court.
Van Dyke Facebook post – 11-4-2019
UPDATE: November 7, 2019
Why is Jason Lee Van Dyke such a violent, mentally ill person who likes to say and do extremely inappropriate – and ILLEGAL – things on social media? Well, perhaps this video will help explain it.
http://www.cc.com/video-clips/bgws7v/the-daily-show-with-trevor-noah-why-is-the-alt-right-so-angry-
At the 45 second mark you will see Van Dyke
People are claiming that Texas Governor Greg Abbott recently sent out the following message on Twitter, so be sure to warn your children!
OFF TO JAIL FOR YOU….
It has been one year since the founder of the Proud Boys white supremacists gang, Gavin McInnes, announced that he was quitting the group. Why?
McInnes, a Vice co-founder who left the magazine in 2008, created the Proud Boys, their rules and membership tiers, including a fourth degree reserved for Proud Boys who get in a fight “for the cause.” Van Dyke claims to be a fourth degree brother and is now their new leader as of November 2018.
Now that the FBI has turned their sights onto the Proud Boys, McGinnes decided it would be time to quit and turn into a government snitch. Seriously!
So why has Gavin McInnes turned into a government snitch? It is to keep his ass from being locked up like these other guys! CHECK IT OUT!!
Gavin has a very nice house and a nice family that he totally does not want to lose.
AND NOW TWO OF VAN DYKE’S PROUD BOYS FOLLOWERS HAVE BEEN CARTED OFF TO STATE PRISON!!
Maxwell Hare and John Kinsman arrive for their trial at the State Supreme Court Building in Manhattan, Aug. 14, 2019
The judge’s remarks at sentencing indicate that despite its pretenses otherwise, the Proud Boys are really just a bunch of street thugs – 100% VERIFIED!
As our long time readers will recall, last summer, Maxwell Hare and John Kinsman were found guilty in New York State Supreme Court of attempted gang assault, attempted assault, and riot. The two were accused of attacking four anti-fascist counter-protesters at an event at New York City’s Metropolitan Club, where Gavin McInnes, the founder of the Proud Boys, was slated to speak.
During sentencing, State Supreme Court justice Mark Dwyer condemned Hare and Kinsman for setting a dangerous precedent for other activists to engage in politically motivated street violence. “I know enough about history to know what happened in Europe in the Thirties,” he said. He also appeared to allude to McInnes’ and Van Dyke’s role in inciting the altercation, saying, “It’s a shame when some people jump up and down on a platform and their followers, their soldiers, get in trouble.”
Proud Boys Founder Gavin McInnes – Proud Boys leader Jason Van Dyke
The judge added, “I’m not sure the most moral responsibility belongs to these two defendants” after finding both McInnes and Van Dyke were responsible for directing the violence that took place in New York City and elsewhere.
Both Kinsman and Hare apologized for their conduct during the Manhattan Supreme Court sentencing. “I’m sorry about the whole mess. I regret the entire incident,” said Kinsman, who is married with three children. “I made a mistake.”
In a similar statement, Hare told the judge, “I made a mistake that night. I made quick decisions. I’m sorry.”
The fight unfolded shortly after McInnes’ speech ended and the Proud Boys exited the venue, as 60 protesters, including members of Antifa, massed behind barricades and jeered at them. To avoid a confrontation, cops directed the Proud Boys west on 83rd Street, then south on Park Avenue, while they shepherded their opponents in the other direction.
As the Proud Boys neared East 82nd Street, they saw six suspected Antifa protesters, clad in black, heading toward them. Instead of walking away, the defendants and their pals sprinted more than 100 feet toward their foes, instigating the fight, Steinglass said.
During the violent confrontation, Kinsman and Hare repeatedly punched, kicked and stomped on the outnumbered and undersize Antifa members. The victims in the case were never identified, and Antifa refused to cooperate with the investigation. Prosecutors said that if they could have located the Antifa members, they would have also been charged.
A total of 10 Proud Boys were charged in connection with the incident. Seven of them took plea deals, and one is still awaiting trial.
According to recent filings in federal court, there are also pending federal charges for violations of Title 18 U.S. Code § 875 – Interstate Threats.
ADDITIONALLY, Some Random Person We’ve Never Heard Of Before has learned that Van Dyke, Gavin McInnes, and other Proud Boys members are under federal investigation for violations of 18 U.S. Code Sections 2101 (Riots), and 371 (Conspiracy), due to Van Dyke’s and McInnes’ involvement and leadership roles in a domestic terrorist group and their responsibility for directing numerous acts of political violence all across the country.
And lastly, as many of you, our teeming MILLIONS of readers, listeners, and supporters know, we here at the BV Files are hosted on a server located overseas in Dubai, UAE, in a data center that also hosts content for pirate movies, animal porn, and stuff from ISIS. As such, we morn with our “neighbors” in ISIS over the death of their leader, who recently committed suicide.
ISIS to review toxic organizational culture after al-Baghdadi suicide
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi – April 29, 2019
IDLIB, Syria – The remaining Islamic State senior leaders are looking inward to address reports of toxic organizational culture following news that their leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, killed himself this weekend.
“His death was tragic but preventable. This is a perfect example of our lack of resiliency,” said one senior ISIS leader. “He was a product of the ‘move-up or blow-up’ system that often forces our fighters into roles for which they are not prepared. It’s completely toxic. The first time some special operations unit comes knocking on their door, they go to pieces. Figuratively, of course.”
“And literally now, I suppose.”
While reports of toxic organizational culture are a revelation to senior ISIS leaders, junior fighters and mid-level militants are not surprised.
“I am treated like a cur and I don’t feel like my talents are being managed,” said one militant, who wished to remain anonymous for fear of reprisal. “I have a ‘raping and pillaging’ background but all they want me to do is plant IEDs. When I try to bring it up to my chain of command, I get marginalized.”
The Islamic State’s new leader, Abdullah Qardash, says he is taking a holistic approach to overhauling ISIS, from managing internal complaints to managing talent.
Abdullah Qardash
“We are hemorrhaging talent,” Qardash told reporters. “And we’re turning over leaders almost as fast as they do in the Pentagon. This is a new generation of jihadis. If we don’t treat them with respect and recognize their additional skills, they will wage jihad for someone else.”
The Islamic State has suffered multiple setbacks over the past few years, including losing territory in both Iraq and Syria, continuous targeting of its top officials, and an epidemic of goat herpes following block leave earlier this year. In an effort to rebrand itself and attract more fighters, ISIS senior leadership has published a “National Jihadis Strategy,” formally giving priority to militants and their enslaved child brides in addition to readiness and lethality.
THIS IS REALLY GOING TO PISS OFF A CERTAIN MEMBER OF THE MCGIBNEY GANG….
- Jon Alan Langbert
- William Hennessey
- Spencer Robuck
- Edward Harper
- Joshua Behrens
- Tarjei Brokken
- Trent Moody
- Cory Kiel
- Daniel Sanderford
All these guys just might want to think about looking for new jobs / homes in the very near future.
SHOW ME THE MONEY….
Beaumont attorney John S. Morgan
John Morgan of Beaumont, Texas, is a drug addict and a child abuser. He is the attorney for James McGibney (who we don’t like). Just moments ago, a federal judge signed an order. CHECK IT OUT!!
American Hero & Honorary Admin of the BV Files Judge Layne Walker is finally going to get paid.
Judge Layne Walker
UPDATE: NOVEMBER 13, 2019
Evan Stone is not just a piece of human garbage, but he is a really shitty lawyer, too. Despite being heavily sanctioned for lying to a federal judge a few years ago in a copyright troll LOLsuit, he clearly has not learned his lesson.
Evan Stone
Now he is about to get sanctioned yet again. CHECK IT OUT!!
*** CLICK ON IMAGE TO VIEW ON YOUR MOBILE DEVICE ***
Fell Clutch case - motion to dismiss
NOVEMBER 15, 2019
Due to the actions of Some Random Person We’ve Never Heard Of Before, Evan Stone is heading for trouble with the Houston Court of Appeals. CHECK IT OUT!!
Supplemental motion for sanctions - Fell Clutch case
This will never not be funny….
McGibney should look in the mirror first
While you may be done with the past, the past is not done with you, PissBoy.
Be sure to check back here Monday for further developments.
Leave a Reply
First!
no you are not first, you might be second but that is all.
My comment appears before yours. As in prior to. As in above.
When this is all over and done, which shouldn’t be much longer, I expect this blog will just fade away. I shall miss dueling with you for the all important firST comment on new articles.
The blog is eternal. Like the flame over Kennedy’s grave in Arlington.
Except that it no longer works from Tor and hardly behaves over VPN, otherwise yes, carved in stone …
Your internet is just really, really shitty. I am on TOR right now, busy posting ‘death threats’ and ‘harrowing libel’ and the blog is working just fine!
I have this crazy Google Fiber thing now, I can basically nuke most developing countries brute force, don’t even need to fiddle with any amplification stuff or botnets.
Do you have any examples of this so called ‘libel’ you are posting?
Picky picky picky. Doing something before someone hardly makes you first.
Neither Trump nor his blue collar street posse, The Proud Boys, are Fascists.
And it’s clear that not BV Files, nor Van Dyke, Rauhauser, Caroline Orr, or even Luke O’Brien have the slightest fucking clue what being a Fascist or supporting Fascism actually means.
This mislabeling of people and institutions for political, legal, or even personal gain is a very destructive CANCER in our national discourse and it must be curbed.
You might want to check out the list of nine names that were just posted in an update near the bottom of the article and get back to us on this.
–Admin Steve
yeah, about those nine names. A simple google search one of them on that list is probably someone that you don’t want to mess with.
Oh why is that?
Why would I say that and ruin all the fun?
Tom is always begging for more guest appearances at these hearings and depositions and court appearance and such.
Wouldn’t it be funny if tomorrow Neal finally came face-to-face with one of his biggest thorns from this past decade?
And what do you suppose could be funnier than that?
For some reason I seriously doubt Neal gives two shits. Not now. Not anymore. Not ever again. You assholes thinking that Neal was afraid, all your super scary (not so scary) claims about FBIs and FOUR WARRANTS and all that good shit is nothing but smoke & mirrors, kid. This ain’t 2013, you know.
#TangoDown
tbe deposition is supposed to be via phone. Neal won’t be coming face to face with anyone. And the only one that can be present and ask any question is Stone, so dream on, knuckleheads who have obviously never been to a deposition.
A simple “phone call” deposition would be as unverifiable as that alleged Richard Spencer audio everyone is going cuckoo over. NAH, this is going to be on video and broadcast across the world!
well, it is not going be broadcast anywhere since that would violate court procedure.
I suppose you’d need to know where to register to obtain the private link.
I cannot imagine anything less interesting that Neal answering mundane questions.
Nothing mundane at all about the questions.
Word on the street is that Evan Stone’s spatula work was unsettling to Neal, that he effectively gave away the farm and left Dorrell holding the bag.
Apparently, Dorrell rolled his eyes at Rauhauser’s responses so much that they had to halt the deposition to make sure Dorrell wasn’t having a seizure!
Thankfully (or regretfully, depending on your allegiances) Dorrell did not seizure, but he might have had one last night when he replayed the video and realized how damage his client had done.
JD is a competent attorney and he would gone over the questions and answers in advance with Neal. None of it sounds relevant to anything.
How do you define the term “beat”? The court of appeals has already declared the case to be a SLAPP lawsuit. The only thing left is just how big of a sanction and award of attorney’s fees it will be. I’m surprised you clowns have not already posted the video from Rauhauser’s deposition. But, of course, you never will because it does not fit McStupid’s narrative on how everybody is supposed to be quaking in fear of the Bullyville bully, am I right? Stone comes off like a total fool. (Funny how for years McStupid has been claiming Rauhauser does… Read more »
Where is the evidence that Rauhauser has a Driver’s License?
Sucks for you being outside the loop.
#TangoDown @Bullyville
No, seriously… where is this evidence you claim exists of Rauhauser having a “driver’s license”?
why do you keep asking this? It is immaterial whether he has a driver’s license or not. Immaterial = makes no difference.
“OperationKleinWatch, FTW” is the one who injected the Rauhauser Driver’s License topic into this discussion.
Why?
yeah no. Julie is nothing. And JD already WON this lawsuit, a fact you oddly seem to forget.
You might want to consider walking away with something rather than nothing.
That’s the actual stage we are in.
The Neal Gets His Child Support Monies Covered train left the station years ago when me and my associates came aboard to fix this mess Morgan and Leiderman created.
The Neal Gets His Child Support Monies Covered train left the station years ago when me and my associates came aboard to fix this mess Morgan and Leiderman created. Yeah, Mister Connecticut Cocksucker to the rescue, eh? The money that Neal wins in ft Worth cannot be touched by anyone. Stone’s fist pounding aside, any nonsense from the Nebraska Attorney General is a total nonissue. You act like some random entity can just swoop in and seize someone else’s monies – money that belongs to a 3rd party, and that ain’t how it works, son! It is utterly bizarre how… Read more »
If the “monies” are owed to Nebraska, Nebraska could file a lien on any funds received by Dorrell on behalf of Rauhauser, and Dorrell could not disburse the funds to Rauhauser until the lien is resolved. But all that assumes that there’s money going to Rauhauser. As far as I know, the Supreme Court of Texas has not yet decided whether or under what circumstances a contingent fee on a TCPA defense is recoverable. The TCPA says the Act entitles the moving party to an award of “court costs, reasonable attorneys’ fees, and other expenses incurred in defending the legal… Read more »
You have a very strange idea on what exactly is a lien and how liens work and who has authority to create and file one.
No, it’s a pretty normal idea. Litigation proceeds aren’t exempt property in Texas, and they can be attached. By statute, child support liens, including out of state child support liens, can be filed in the county where the suit is pending, and the lien attaches to any nonexempt personal real property owned by the obligor, including litigation proceeds. And if a lien was filed, Dorrell’s lien for attorney’s fees takes precedence, but after that, anyone with notice of the lien would have to pay the monies over to the Nebraska child support agency (or the ex wife, or whoever it… Read more »
You might have a point if we were talking about proceeds from a personal injury case. But court sanctions are neither damages nor a personal injury award. Sanctions are sanctions.
Besides, if you had been paying attention at all you would have learned that Rauhauser already got paid for his role.
It doesn’t make a damn bit of difference whether they’re proceeds of a personal injury case or sanctions. Either way, they not exempt personal or real property under the Texas Government Code and The Texas Constitution, so they’re subject to a child support lien. So if a lien was flied, no one with notice of the lien can pay the money to Rauhauser, and if they do, they’ll be liable to the lienholder for the money personally. As for whether Neal “already got paid for his role,” so what? I don’t know or care. All I’m talking about is the… Read more »
If something is neither real nor personal property, a lien cannot attach to it, is the point I am trying to make.
You think you are the first person in America to try to claim that a child support lien attaches to court sanctions? lololololololololol
You point is as sharp as a pancake. Money is classified as personal property under the applicable law. Litigation proceeds, including monetary sanctions, are personal property, but they are not exempt personal property. If they were exempt property under the Texas Constitution and the
Government Codesec. 42.001 of the Property Code, the lien wouldn’t attach. But because money is not exempt personal property unless its listed in sec. 42,.001(b), and court-award sanctions are not listed, such sanctions are non-exempt personal property and they subject to the lien (if a lien has been filed).Your point is as sharp as a pancake. Money is classified as personal property under the applicable law. Litigation proceeds, including monetary sanctions, are personal property, Nice of you to worry about something that is totally not your business. Whatever Hanszen Laporte decides to do with the money is out of your control. Besides, if you had been paying the slightest bit of attention around here you would have known something that our long time readers have known about for many years. Texas Property Code Sec. 12.014. TRANSFER OF JUDGMENT OR CAUSE OF ACTION. (a) A judgment or part of… Read more »
That’s nice. So if the judgment or cause of action has been sold, has it been filed? ‘Cause if not, a lien filed first would likely have priority. And if the cause of action was sold to someone who had notice of the lien (whether filed or not), the transfer may be voidable as a fraudulent transfer. But honestly, I don’t give a shit who, if anyone, ends up with the money monies. I’m just talking about how the law works. But you’d agree that whoever does get the money, monies it not going to be Rauhauser, right? Whether it’s… Read more »
I’m just talking about how the law works. Okay, Mister Connecticut Cocksucker. Thank you for telling us all how shit works. So if the judgment or cause of action has been sold, has it been filed? ‘Cause if not, a lien filed first would likely have priority Even I know that you are totally full of shit here. If something has been sold or transferred, it’s gone. Someone else is the new owner. The date of filing of the transfer document has absolutely nothing to do with the date or sale or ownership. If you weren’t some homeless shit head,… Read more »
Dear Admin Mike, I am not now nor have I ever been a “Connecticut Cocksucker,” either in whole or in part. I’ve never been to Connecticut and never sucked a cock, whether from Connecticut or anywhere else. You have me confused with someone else. I am not in any way affiliated with James McGibney or his hard hittin’ crew. Or with Evan Stone, JLVD, the Proud Boys, or, so far as I know, anyone else who posts here. I’m just a humble Texas lawyer who became acquainted with this dumpster fire due to the shenanigans of John Morgan and Philip… Read more »
Yes, we know.
And it is also safe to say that you are not the eponymous Catty Idiot.
— Admin Steve (who does not smoke dope all day with Admin Mike)
I doubt that: JLVD is your client. You’re a Texas lawyer. Probably from the Houston area. You dislike John Morgan. You dislike JLVD too, but took his case for the money. You use the same name “No One of Consequence” that you do on your Twitter account. Logical conclusion: You are Mark Bennett. I wonder how long before “one of the world’s foremost experts” on Tom R sees this message (and the logical connection) and fires your ass. It doesn’t exactly inspire confidence when you trash talk your client on his enemy’s blog.
Nice try, but I don’t have a Twitter account, I don’t work out of Houston, and I’ve never met Mark Bennett or JLVD. I’d never even heard of Bennett before some of his stuff was posted here. “No One of Consequence” is how the Dread Pirate Roberts answered when Princess Buttercup asked who he was. It’s hardly original, and should it not be surprising that more than one person on the Internet would use the same literary/movie/pop culture reference as a pseudonym. Also, I wouldn’t be posting comments on this blog if I were currently involved in and cases involving… Read more »
^ What he said. I was just going to write that.
Neal probably should have gone into court many years ago and had the child support adjusted to his income. Can he still do that now? It sounds like Neal’s ex-wife and kids have had plenty of money and been well cared for all this time. The kids are now adults. Chasing after a man for money when he does not have any and is struggling to survive is ugly; uglier still if the mom and kids are all set. I suppose it was the wife’s haranguing and ill-will that sent her husband out the door. You can tell Neal’s ex-wife… Read more »
She was sober from 1987 until 2001 or 2002. Her behavior started to change … and now she’s been back at it longer than she was clean. She had an inheritance 5x – 10x what our mortgage was, still lost the house. First child is a mess, the second seems to compensate by being maximum over-achiever.
Sad for all members of my family. McGibney’s interference was disastrous.
McGibney had ZER0.point.ZER0 involvement in your decisions and actions with regard to your second failed marriage. It’s real easy to go around claiming your ex isn’t sober (if that is even true). But it’s much more difficult to admit your own failures – which you never do. It’s important context for readers to understand that when your son was shot in the head during a drug deal gone bad, you didn’t even attempt to go see him. And when your mother (who gave you a home and tried to raise you right) was dying you didn’t bother to go home… Read more »
Bizarre how you think to meddle in the affairs of others, that you think you know people whom you have never met or talked to.
To bad your “meddling” is no more effective then your #FailDox and other claims of being in control here.
hey BV files, what you wrote is SO true. These stalkers who think they know everything about everyone.. and think they have a right to meddle in — and think they have a right to post crap. This smells of Steve Hatlestad, James McGibney, and a few others.
hey “0-point-0,” you are a stalker. You do not know anything whatever about him, yet you claim to, and you write these scurrilous things. That makes you a far worse person than anyone else.
The irony of such a statement coming from someone as disturbed as you is too rich to even explore at the moment.
Neal’s tagalong comment is barely coherent. Hope he got some sleep. He’s got a very slow and deliberate reckoning ahead just yonder.
Welp, he still gets to be the whipping boy at the end of all this, so your interpretation of matters is at best cold comfort for him.
Translating from stalker sycophant to English:
Pissboy is really, REALLY, REALLY pissed that, after years of his interfering in my personal and professional relationships, the little scraps of information he gets about my life are either fake, or they lead to people who are utterly hardened against his penny ante extortionist shuffle.
Furthermore, when presented with situations where a person with a normal life would be on a plane at once, I just shrug, because I see my batshit crazy ex reaching out to Pissboy BEFORE she tries to contact me with some guilt trip strategy.
Yeah, it is sickening that your ex-wife has invited an extortionist psychopath to interfere in your family.
I’ve spoken with “Pissboy” about a dozen times since Monday afternoon. I think it’s fair to say he is completely un-phased by your renewed PRO-Troll efforts here. In fact, we are all re-energized and highly entertained by your predictable shit-stirring antics and storytelling! You waste all that time laying out your stupid rabbit holes and traps. That PRO-Troll shit may have worked on McGibney for a short time earlier in the decade, but this ain’t 2013 anymore! It’s bizarre how you still don’t seem to grasp that this is about something much bigger than some little Twitter spat. Please run… Read more »
Got news for ya. James McGibney’s “big thing” that he is all about is how to make money by harming innocent people. That’s what ViaView, Inc was and is all about. It’s what Bullyville and Cheaterville are all about. It’s what owning all those domains and emails in other peoples’ names is all about. It’s what the lawsuits are all about. If you hang with McGibney, you are as bad as he is.
He’s either completely terrified or completely, utterly delusional. I bet it’s what’s behind door #2 – the questions in the deposition that were outside the scope of what judge Cosby allowed reveal the contour of McGibney’s theory of defense: “James believes he can convince the court that his seven years of stalking and harassing me, culminating in what has now been sixty nine months of frivolous litigation, was all a dastardly plot on my part to set him up for a TCPA response.” No, really, the focus on who paid the retainer (me), on who benefits from any recovery (Hanszen… Read more »
But… but… A Vexatious Litigant said in a previous comment that you sold the cause of action (or judgment or whatever) years ago (presumably to him). If it was sold to him (or anyone else), how can it be that you’re still getting the monies? A Vexatious Litigant wouldn’t fib on this here edification blog, would he? Because if you can’t believe what you read here, what can you believe?
You are a fucking retarded asshole. If a “male” breeds he is responsible just as his partner for the kid(s). She has every right to collect money owed from this fucking asshole Neal.
US Citizens of normal cognitive function could not agree with you more!
My children needed a father much more than my ex-wife needed additional money to squander.
That being said, there is a plan to retire that debt, and it doesn’t require whatever Hanszen Laporte squeezes out of Pissboy. I will hold the undischargeable debt, much like a state child support agency, while it would appear Tom Retzlaff intends to assume the role of the crazy, vindictive ex-wife.
Funny, this is almost like life imitating art, isn’t it?
Is Tom involved?
Of what undischargeable debt do you speak?
It will soon be alllllll gone. NO sanctions. NO attorney’s fees.
Sorry to be the one to tell you that. Oh wait! I warned you all the way back in early 2016!
Great going, “Best Laid Plans.” You have solved the case, so now you and Della Street can go celebrate.
I think you need to give up on the “nondischargeable” part. Putting in the “willfulness and maliciousness” language in the last judgment was a clever move — too clever, I think — but the court of appeals said the district court lacked the authority to make that finding. And absent that finding, the debt’s not nondischargeable under Chapter 7.
I would be willing to bet that a debt in the form of court sanctions is totally NONDISCHARGABLE for the same reasons court fines are not. And for the same reasons intentional torts are nondischargable.
–An Admin not named Jeffrey Dorrell
Court fines are payable to the government, and the government doesn’t like to give up its own money. Restitution is also nondischargeable, but only if the order is issued under Chapter 18 U.S.C. (i.e., for a federal crime). As for intentional torts, they come under the “willful and malicious injury” section, which the court of appeals knocked out in the Rauhauser case. See 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(6) & (7). But on further review, you might still be right. There’s case law from within the Fifth Circuit that holding that sanctions for violation of a court order were nondischargeable under the “willful… Read more »
Have you or anyone at your law firm ever won a case before the US Supreme Court regarding the nondischargability of a debt for “willful or malicious injury”? Just asking because the attorney on the other side of this has – as you know.
–An Admin not named Tom
Possibly. “No One of Consequence” is Mark Bennett.
Mark Bennett may be a person of no consequence, but he is not the “No One of Consequence” who has been posting on this thread. And in response to Admin Not Tom’s question, no. I don’t ordinarily do bankruptcy law, but I can read. Also, I know for a fact that Dorrell put that “willful and malicious” language in the order with an eye toward making the fees and sanctions nondischargeable. (I know this because I asked him.) Maybe they’d still be nondischargeable without that language in the order, but I doubt it. There’s no requirement that the conduct at… Read more »
are you the Breeder Police?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
it sounds like you are mislabeling CANCER.
Cancer is Cancer!
So weird that Neal has his current Twitter locked since last Thursday. Why would he do that? Also weird when one considers he locked that account about the same time the Gravatars and copypasta stopped working here.
You should ask him about that when you get a chance.
–An Admin not named Neal
Shhh…
Neal locking his twitter account is not “weird.”
Anyone locking their twitter account is not weird. It is a security feature provided for use by the users.
Nah. It’s as weird as the great Gravatar Oppression and the “locking of content” thereby disabling cut and paste. All of them happened around the same time someone came here and posted as “Neal Rauhauser” from his TUMBLR.
Weird is good.
Weird makes natural born partial retards go full retard here in the comments section.
Between the Buzzfeed FOIA catastrophe Sunday, the deposition Monday, and Roger Stone’s trial starting in about five hours, I predict that there will be a great deal of that during November.
We have fun playing with you, but I doubt this comments section cares about what is going on with Buzzfeed or Roger Stone. It is Evan Stone we comment on.
Ah, but Evan and Roger are cousins. Do your research before you open your mouth here.
Weird that he only mentions Buzzfeed and not CNN who was part of that FOIA lawsuit.
You might want to read Article 13.37 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure before playing amateur lawyer about questions of venue.
Thanks! We posted an update in the article about this very thing.
–Admin Mike (hates Tom Brady cuz he cheats!)
And you still got it wrong. The offense punishes both actual harm and a threat to cause harm. If actual harm is caused, which it wasn’t here, its prosecuted where the harm occurred. If it was threats, its prosecuted where the threat originates or was received. That means that, technically, JLVD is correct. There was no jurisdiction.
who are you to say harm was not caused? That would be in the eyes of the person harmed.
Jurisdiciton and venue are very different things, and sec. 13.37 is a venue provision. Venue controls where the prosecution occurs, not which court can issue a warrant. A venue provision does not restrict a court’s power to issue an arrest warrant prior to the commencement of prosecution. Emerson v. Borland, 927 S.W.2d 709, 721 (Tex. App.–Austin 1996, writ denied) (rejecting argument that only court specified in the venue statute had authority to issue arrest warrant). “Courts have jurisdiction to issue warrants with statewide authority regardless of where venue lies.” Id. So it doesn’t really matter whether venue would have been… Read more »
an arrest warrant? If there is probable cause and an affidavit saying so, then any arrest warrant will be upheld. Don’t believe me? Try it.
Nevertheless, the officer clearly and deliberately lied on his affidavit. The department did not have jurisdiction to investigate or make an arrest,
they can always investigate. The threshold for an arrest is very low. You are barking up the wrong tree.
fiRsT!
fix this i cannot copy and paste.
oh for the love of god will you please fixt the comments so they show the avatars and so we can cut and paste. question mark.
When will this madness end?
Is it possible Neal, TR, James, JLVD one day can walk away and go on with your lives?
You can claim all you want it’s free speech to call people out but it has to get tiring. Are you all gonna be old men like Steve at irontroll, a man in his 60’s photoshopping photos that look like a 5 year old did “social justice” blogging?
That isn’t going to happen. Once TR starts in on someone, he never stops. JLVD has explicitly stated that this is a “fight to the death” and that he will never stop until TR is dead or in prison. So this is a case of an immovable object against an irresistable force. One of the two will eventually die or go to prison over this.
James McGibney started stalking people at least 10 years ago or more and he has not stopped. He got slowed down on twitter, but only because twitter perma-banned him and now he can only use a tiny locked account and always hopes they won’t catch him. If you look at the group of people that follow McGibney’s current Twitter account, you see the group of nut jobs for whom he performs his stalking act.
Steve is more talented at Photoshopping than Julie Sigwart (who goes around claiming to be a graphic artist). Sigwart’s “McGibney Behind Bars” image is poorly done. His face is blurred, but the body is sharp. It’s just so amateurish.
I like the pic of McGibney behind bars, although I do not know who created it. It’s a rare picture that shows him where he belongs. It belongs in The Louvre.
Van Dyke is not the leader of the Proud Boys and was in that post for a grand total of three days during which time his only act was to grant a petition for a do-over election (since the first was held over Thanksgiving). In the do over election, Enrique Tarrio became the chairman. Except for that three day period, he was never the leader. He was a generally well-liked and respected brother, but the only position he held was as the lawyer for the fraternity and the sergeant at arms of his local chapter. Your article is factually incorrect.… Read more »
What is Retzlaff doing to your “brothers”, exactly?
This proves that associating oneself with a terrorist organization, even as their leader for 3 days, is not wise.
The judge in NY City does not agree with you, as the transcript clearly shows.
Except that our new legal team has the transcript and it doesn’t mention Van Dyke or Tarrio. In any case, the NYC9 fight happened in October of 2018 and the approximately three days that Van Dyke was in charge was in November of 2018. The Proud Boys had no “chairman” in October of 2018 and it never had any sort of official leader until November of 2018. Gavin was the founder of the fraternity, but he never purported to be its leader. He was not even the president of his own chapter in New York City. The chairman position was… Read more »
November, October, Chairman, leader, founder, member, brother. blah blah blah. You all are part of a terrorist group running the streets of American cities beating up people and no one outside your group cares about all these tiny internal distinctions. You’re all a bunch of idiots.
Maybe some people just need a good old fashioned country ass whopping. Speaking of which, how long has it been since you’ve had your ass whopped?
So all that’s left here is me sticking my nose in, the admins, Hatlestad, and McGibney?
Seems about right. Three hours to go, just bumping along in the train. Gonna get into San Jose a bit earlier, maybe take in some sights before the event.
Where is Hatlestad? Where is McGibney? Have you NOT yet learned your lesson about NOT “reality forging” evidence?
By the way, don’t get distracted with your blog here… it’s important to be prompt and on-time for these depos!
Where did you dock the boat? Why are you going to San Jose?
Now, if I were a marginal but slippery hacker/scam-artist without a pot to piss and I was on a court mandated field trip to somewhere in Northern California – Sacratomato, for example – where might I be right now? Roots? The Naked Lounge? Shine? Identity. Or perhaps visiting an associate.
Or maybe I just hop on the Capitol Corridor Amtrak and visit Piedmont.
I dunno, but I imagine it would have taken less than 5 minutes to pinpoint his location this morning.
It is just bizarre at how you McGibney Gang assholes are so obsessed with posting comments claiming you know where this person is or where that person is or where some guy over there is. It is like you think that this gives you some sort of magical powers over the other person.
And how’s that working for ya, bitch??
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Pretty well! Thanks for asking!
Yeah that little mixed minx that Collin is porking is one hot piece of ass. Please tell them to keep fucking on that couch in full view of the XBox camera. Please tell them that I prefer reverse cowgirl so I can see her cute little brown titties bounce and that nicely trimmed bush!
There is so much dried cum on that couch you have to wonder if Tom secretly gets off on that.
James McGibney, still stalking people.
I’m not James McGibney, you silly twat.
Yup, I went into Sacramento, paid for a couple hours in an executive office, rounded up a notary. She glanced at my driver’s license, gave me a card stamped with her seal, and then she swore me in.
If I were some sort of fugitive, I suppose the Sacramento FBI office would have dispatched their Pissboy Rescue Team to collect me, but since that’s not the case, I lounged around for a couple hours, then made my way back down to the river and headed home.
Weird that you think the PRT would simply collect you rather than doing what they did instead.
TX Copyright Lawyer, why you gotta always make stupid comments?
You mean ignoring frantic calls from a histrionic crackpot who has left a trail of threat hoaxes over the years? Year, that’s quite unlike them.
Your copyright work must involve limericks found on public bathroom walls …
You mean ignoring frantic calls from a histrionic crackpot who has left a trail of threat hoaxes over the years?” The so-called “threat hoax” game is your racket in your realm of FAR LEFT political mischief making. In FACT, your reputation for taking your chaotic dirty tricks too far brings NO joy to law enforcement. McGibney and all other law-abiding Patriots you have obsessively attacked and maligned have a right to report and document those deceitful campaigns of unlawful conduct and harassment which has been waged against them. There once was a deadbeat named Neal, who liked to conflate, delate,… Read more »
McGibney sought to destroy the people of the United States for his own financial gain. That is not a patriot. He is a criminal and a toad.
I stand by my Limerick. It tells you all you need to know about where Neal stands legally after Monday!
WEren’t you the clown who did not even know what a deposition is? That’s right, you are.
Definitely not. I am quite adept at depositions. In fact, I like to disarm the deponent by taking on an understated professorial persona and present a measured degree of timidity. It’s very effective when confronted with a passive aggressive deponent who is a bundle of nerves and struggles with telling the truth.
Wow, how did I miss this gem when it was posted?
There’s one fucktard in every crowd, it’s some kinda rule.
It looks like JLVBD’s out to prove the old addage that a lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client. And he really needs to stop using John Morgan’s stuff as a go-by. As he would know if he read Judge Hawthorn’s August 14, 2015, opinion in Hartman v. Walker where he explains that there is no independent claim for malicious prosecution under sec. 1983. So the Second Cause of Action easily gets dismissed for failure to state a claim. And on the false arrest/perjured warrant affidavit issue, the only thing VD identifies as allegedly false is the… Read more »
Why would Van Dyke agree to it? He has nothing left to lose.
Rule 11 has a “safe harbor” provision that requires the motion be served on the person subject to the motion 21-days before the motion can be filed with the court. If JLVD dismisses the Complaint before the motion can filed, he could avoid being sanctioned under Rule 11 for filing a frivolous lawsuit. If he ignores Rule 11 motion and elects to proceed with a frivolous suit, his chances of getting sanctioned go way up. He can still lose money.
It does not matter what Van Dyke does or does not do. The outcome will be the same. Time is very short for him.
You Team Felon clowns have literally been saying that for months. There is no evidence of pending federal charges and all state charges are resolved. Team Felon knows this and they are just trying to stir the pot.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Besides, do you how long it takes to conduct a federal investigation?
Then what is with all this “time is short” nonsense?
It is probably just nonsense. I would not pay it any mind at all.
you can’t lose money if you have no money to lose. Where would he get so much as a dime to pay a court judgment?
But you’ve already been paid so it doesn’t matter, right?
He is your client. Reign him in.
lol @ evan stone
#GFY McGibney
#TangoDown @Bullyville
As we of the ardent opposition have long held – it has been confirmed that Tom R has never paid a single invoice in the Rauhauser case.
It was also confirmed that Neal R never paid a single invoice in the Rauhauser case either.
Sounds like James McGibney has to pay it all!
All of 0 would be 0!
Last I heard, it was something like $500,000. That is very reasonable for so many years of litigation forced by James McGibney, who has a large piece of petrified poop where most people have a brain.
“who has a large piece of petrified poop where most people have a brain”
Does he though? Does he?
If it wasn’t for court costs, I wonder why Tom R gave Neal money?
My guess is those legal fees will be deducted when a certain partner cashes out and rides off quietly into the sunset.
Something you have been “predicting” for how many years now, and it still has not happened?
and? So what?
You should go back and re-examine McGibney’s court pleadings before opening your mouth and making such a stupid statement. The whole point behind McGibney photoshopping that Brittany “affidavit” (which was not an affidavit but really a forgery) was in support of McGibney’s and Stone’s claims that the Texas LOLsuit was some kind of reverse lawfare scam perpetrated by Retzlaff! That has been McGibney’s and Stone’s theme from the very beginning.
What is a lawfarm? Which leads me to ask what is a reverse lawfarm?